<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Brain</title>
	<link>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/</link>
	<description>Brain Fitness and Cognitive Health news</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alvaro</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80645</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80645</guid>
					<description>Hello Joel, great question: what is the limit of neuroplasticity. 

There is not much research there, so let me speculate a bit. Our brain is way more malleable than we usually think it is. Having said that, as we age we accumulate experiences that shape our brains and, in a sense, reduce the range of possibility. It would be tough to think (medical problems excepted) of a "smart" person becoming "dumb", or vicaeversa. But both could benefit from working on refining their brains and minds. 

Another way: for a native English-speaker, learning fluent Chinese would require significant brain change. This is easier when we are kids, more difficult as we grow older. 

Being practical, I'd reiterate the previous comment: our brains are more malleable than we think we are. I have seen research showing how adults with spider phobia can learn to prevent amygdala activation-they literally conquer their fear. What is the precise limit? good question to ponder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Joel, great question: what is the limit of neuroplasticity. </p>
<p>There is not much research there, so let me speculate a bit. Our brain is way more malleable than we usually think it is. Having said that, as we age we accumulate experiences that shape our brains and, in a sense, reduce the range of possibility. It would be tough to think (medical problems excepted) of a &quot;smart&quot; person becoming &quot;dumb&quot;, or vicaeversa. But both could benefit from working on refining their brains and minds. </p>
<p>Another way: for a native English-speaker, learning fluent Chinese would require significant brain change. This is easier when we are kids, more difficult as we grow older. </p>
<p>Being practical, I'd reiterate the previous comment: our brains are more malleable than we think we are. I have seen research showing how adults with spider phobia can learn to prevent amygdala activation-they literally conquer their fear. What is the precise limit? good question to ponder...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80588</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80588</guid>
					<description>I just became aquainted to neuroplasticity and it seems a very important aspect we should all be aware of!... But, I wonder... how far can you actually mold your brain?  Is such a thing as personality and intelligence completely malleable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just became aquainted to neuroplasticity and it seems a very important aspect we should all be aware of!... But, I wonder... how far can you actually mold your brain?  Is such a thing as personality and intelligence completely malleable
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alvaro</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80134</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80134</guid>
					<description>Hello Ian: I agree with you. If we had organized that contest, we would have defined merit-based criteria. However, the fact is that the rules are different from what you or I would have done.

I don't know Shelley personally, so cannot speak about her "charisma and popularity". I simply know that she writes a great neuroscience blog. And that her blog is one of the few science-based blogs among the finalists.

Of course, your decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ian: I agree with you. If we had organized that contest, we would have defined merit-based criteria. However, the fact is that the rules are different from what you or I would have done.</p>
<p>I don't know Shelley personally, so cannot speak about her &quot;charisma and popularity&quot;. I simply know that she writes a great neuroscience blog. And that her blog is one of the few science-based blogs among the finalists.</p>
<p>Of course, your decision.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80093</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2007/10/11/on-the-brain/#comment-80093</guid>
					<description>If one wanted to ensure that we learnt more about our brains, wouldn't it make more sense to award scholarships based on talent and ability, rather than on charisma and popularity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one wanted to ensure that we learnt more about our brains, wouldn't it make more sense to award scholarships based on talent and ability, rather than on charisma and popularity?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
